Friday, October 26, 2012

HERERO PEOPLE: THE FEARLESS AND WAR-LIKE AFRICAN TRIBE THAT SUFFERED THE WORLD`S FIRST HOLOCAUST AT THE HANDS OF GERMANS

The Herero (meaning "to throw an assegai") people are related to the Bantu people and speak a Bantu language. They live primarily in Namibia and Botswana in southwest Africa and number about 175,000. They are believed to have migrated from the Lake Tanganyika area in the east during the 18th century.
                      Beautiful herero women in their traditonal outfit


                  Herero woman 1900,Namibia,Africa


 Legend has it that the Herero once left 'a country of many mountains'. They came to a lead wood tree where the two leaders, Kathu, and his brother Nangombe decided to part ways. Kathu trekked north, while Nangombe stayed in Namibia to establish the Herero nation. The word Herero may be derived from okuhera, meaning 'to throw an assegai'. Indeed they were a fearless and warlike nation, taking on the might of the German empire in 1904.



A procession of Hereros dressed in traditional military-style uniforms led by Uetuesapi Mungendje (center) and Keeper of the Holy Fire Chief Tjipene Keja (left). The red accents in the uniforms indicate membership in the Red Flag faction

Location
Approximately 150,000 Herero live in Namibia and about 20,000 in Botswana. The Herero make up approximately 7% of Namibia's population. The Herero have also scattered throughout southern Angola. Oral history has it that the Herero people group left the great lakes region of eastern Africa in the 1500s. They spent the next two centuries migrating to southwestern Africa where they settled in central Namibia. Things were relatively peaceful for the Herero for the next 150 years or so except for the occasional skirmish with the tribes from the south who were pushed north by South Africans who desired their grazing lands. The Herero are herders and the plains of central Namibia are perfect for grazing the cows that are foundational to their culture.

 Herero women wearing traditional Victorian-style dresses and headdress shaped after cattle horns. The headdress symbolizes their relationship with cattle farming, which is central to the Herero economy and lifestyle

Culture
Inheritance: The Herero of Namibia and Botswana are unique among southern Africa's indigenous people in that they inherit different things from the mother's and father's families. Residence, religion, and authority are taken from the father's line, while the inheritance of wealth is passed through the mother's clan.

                     Herero woman

Livelihood: Traditionally, the Herero were nomadic pastoralists. Following contact with Europeans in the mid-19th century, many have become subsistence farmers, growing grains and raising sheep, cattle, and fowl.
                            A-herero-woman-with-children-in-traditional-clothing

Marriage: Apparently, not much significance is attached to marriage in the Herero group. No personal relationship exists between a man and his wife. 

They each keep their own wealth and property. Each man has several wives, although a married woman is not allowed to have additional husbands. Despite the legalities, many women do have relationships with other men.

Dress: The striking Herero women's dress is derived from the Victorian era. German missionaries encouraged the women to wear clothes according to the fashion in Europe at the time. Until the mid 19th century, Herero people like others in southern Africa wore clothing made of leather.

 Men and children wore different kinds of leather aprons, and male heroes wore special pieces of animal fur and other ornaments. Adult women wore two leather skirt ieces around their waists, along leather shawl decorated with iron beads and a headdress with three points on top.
                          Traditional Owambo Herero dress

Like their African neighbours, the Herero began wearing European style clothing in the 1850s, after Europeans missionaries began to settle in southern Africa. Herero people saw rival Nama groups and missionaries wearing western clothing. Today items of Herero clothing are still named after parts of the leather dress, suggesting that Herero people see continuity between the two types of dress codes.
                      "Herero women and children in traditional costume; Sehitwa, Ngamiland." (Circa1940)

Many children wear leather aprons when they are not in school. Men wear mostly store bought clothes but when they participate in the annual days of Herero cultural celebration they wear military type uniforms and bits of animal fur.



Religion: The Herero believe in a Supreme Being, called Omukuru, the Great One, or Njambi Karunga. Like the Himba they also have a holy, ritual fire which symbolizes life, prosperity and fertility to them. However, the majority have been converted to Christianity, although the Herero church, the Oruuano, combines Christian dogma with ancestor worship and magical practices
                                    Herero woman cooking


Before the Genocide Was Committed on Hereros
Africa is almost certainly the birthplace of the human species. From it the earliest people ventured into Asia and then across the long-vanished land bridge to the Americas, or across the Pacific island chains to Australasia. They also spread to the lands north of the Mediterranean Sea.

 Many thousands of years later their European descendants gained glory and wealth by rediscovering the southern hemisphere, and plundering it. They – we – have often treated it, and its inhabitants, with brutality, indifference and contempt. White Europeans forced black Africans to become slaves. White Europeans deprived black people of their homes and communities and cultures.

 White Europeans sent their missionaries to change black people’s religion to their own. And in the 19th century white Europeans began moving into Africa to occupy the land as well. The land was desirable for itself: it provided new territory, new possessions and new trade, both for individuals and their countries. The land had other values, too: it provided bases for further take-overs and further military threats; and, above all, it contained riches.
                         Hereros in their hut before the war

Along the coastline of Namibia runs the Namib desert, a 1,200 mile long strip of unwelcoming sand dunes and barren rock. Behind it is the central mountain plateau, and east of that the Kalahari desert. Namibia’s scarcest commodity is water: this is a country of little rainfall, and the rivers don’t always run. But the very sand of the Skeleton Coast is the dust of gemstones; uranium, tin and tungsten can be mined in the central Namib, and copper in the north; and in the south there are diamonds.

Namibia also has gold, silver, lithium, and natural gas. For most of the region’s history, only metal was of interest to the native tribes. These tribes lived and traded together more or less peacefully, each with their own particular way of living, wherever the land was fertile enough. The San were nomads, hunters and gatherers. The Damara hunted and worked copper. The Ovambo grew crops in the north, where there was more rain, but also worked in metal. The Nama and the Herero were livestock farmers, and they were the two main tribes in the 1840s when the Germans (first missionaries, then settlers, then soldiers) began arriving in South West Africa.

            Herero - Near old German mission cemetery in Okahandja - Otjozondjupa Region - 1900

Before the Germans, only a few Europeans had visited it: explorers, traders and sailors. They opened up trade outlets for ivory and cattle; they also brought in firearms, with which they traded for Namib treasures. Later, big guns and European military systems were introduced. The tribes now settled their disputes with lethal violence: corruption of a peaceful culture was under way.
         Hendrik Witbooi (sitting on the chair) with fighters of the Nama tribe, ca 1904-1905

During The Berlin Conference of 1888 Germany was awarded South West Africa (what is now called Namibia). The  Germans made South West Africa their own colony, and settlers moved in, followed by a military governor who knew little about running a colony and nothing at all about Africa. Major Theodor Leutwein began by playing off the Nama and Herero tribes against each other. More and more white settlers arrived, pushing tribesmen off their cattle-grazing lands with bribes and unreliable deals. The Namib’s diamonds were discovered, attracting yet more incomers with a lust for wealth.

 German colonial administrator Theodor Gotthilf Leutwein (seated left) and Herero Supreme Chief  Maharero - 1895

Tribal cattle-farmers had other problems, too: a cattle-virus (rinderpest) epidemic in the late 1890s killed much of their livestock. The colonists offered the Herero aid on credit. As a result the farmers amassed large debts, and when they couldn’t pay them off the colonists simply seized what cattle were left. In January 1904, the Herero, desperate to regain their livelihoods, rebelled. Under their leader Samuel Maherero they began to attack the numerous German outposts. Chief Maharero gave very specific instructions that only farmers, traders and soldiers would be attacked. He explicitly stated that missionaries, Britons and Boers were not to be harmed. In most cases, the Herero warriors followed Maharero's instructions to the letter - sparing women, children, missionaries and non-Germans. The Herero cut telegraph wires, destroyed railway lines, stole cattle and overran smaller military stations. Initially about 150 Germans were killed, which provoked colonial outrage. The mere fact the 'savages' had the audacity to challenge white claims of superiority and lands in 'their colony', enhanced racist attitudes which had always been rife amongst the settler population.
                                    Chief Samuel Maherero, the leader of Herero tribe

At the same time, the Nama chief, Hendrik Witbooi, wrote a letter to Theodor Leutwein, telling him what the native Africans thought of their invaders, who had taken their land, deprived them of their rights to pasture their animals on it, used up the scanty water supplies, and imposed alien laws and taxes. His hope was that Leutwein would recognise the injustice and do something about it.

                                                      Chief Witbooi of the Namaq Tribe



THE  GERMAN  COLONIAL  WAR OF ANNIHILATION  AGAINST  THE  HERERO NATION
“I, the great general of the German soldiers, send this letter to the Herero people. The Hereros are no longer German subjects. They have murdered and robbed, they have cut off the ears and noses and privy parts of wounded soldiers, and they are now too cowardly to fight. I say to the nation: Any person who delivers one of the Herero captains as a captive to a military post will receive 1,000 Marks. The one who hands over Samuel will receive 5,000 Marks. All Herero must leave the country. If they do not, I will force them with cannons to do so. Within the German frontier every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will not take over any more women and children, but I will either drive them back to your people or have them fired on. These are my words to the Herero people. The great General of the Mighty Kaiser, von Trotha.”

On 9 September 2001, the Herero People's Reparations Corporation lodged a claim in a civil court in the US District of Columbia. The claim was directed against the Federal Republic of Germany, in the person of
the German foreign minister, Joschka Fischer, for crimes against humanity, slavery, forced labor, violations of international law, and genocide. 


909.  

Ninety-seven years earlier, on n January 1904, in a small and dusty town in central Namibia, the first genocide of the twentieth Century began with the eruption of the Herero—German war.' By the time
hostilities ended, the majority of the Herero had been killed, driven off their land, robbed of their cattle, and banished to near-certain death in the sandy wastes of the Omaheke desert. 

The survivors, mostly women and children, were incarcerated in concentration camps and put to work as forced laborers (Gewald, 1995; 1999: 141—91). Throughout the twentieth Century, Herero survivors and their descendants have struggled to gain recognition and compensation for the crime committed against them.
 At the  beginning  of the  twentieth  century,  the Hereros  numbered  approximately  80,00020  in Hereroland  (also  known  as  South  West  Africa, today  Namibia),  where  the  German  colonial  enterprise lasted  from  1884 to  1919. The  German  merchant  Adolf Lideritz  purchased  the  harbor  of


Angra Pequena  and its surrounding  lands,  located  on the southern  coast of present-day  Namibia,  in  1883  and  began  calling  for German  protection. The following year, Germany  declared Lideritz's land a protectorate. The Herero  Nation,  seeking  military  support  in  conflicts  with  the  Nama,  another  indigenous  nation  in  the region,  entered  into  a  treaty  of friendship and protection with the German  government in  1885. The German colonial policy of divide and rule saw governor Theodore Leutwein in 1894 recognise Samuel Maherero, a faction to the vacant Herero throne and  a preferred educated businessman who sold lands to Germans, rather than the more traditional Asas Rirua, as successor to Chief Tjamuaha of the Hereros. The Herero Nation withdrew  from  the  treaty when the Germans were unable  to  provide  the expected  military  assistance." The  treaty  was  later revived  and  a  further peace  agreement was  concluded  in  1894, but the German colonial  administration  did  not  "exercise  sovereignty  over the  territory  as  it  was  internationally  demarcated" until  1907. The first Herero uprising on March 14 1897 failed, but seven years later, Samuel Maherero, sobered by the land-grabbing of the Germans, rose with his people at Okahandja in May 1904, killing every German farmer and trader they could and seizing 25 000 head of cattle. .Nonetheless,  Germany  retained power in  South  West  Africa  until  1919,  when  it  lost  its  colonies as a  result  of World War I. This Part  details the German colonial administration's  war of annihilation against the Hereros  at the  beginning  of the  twentieth century and establishes that this conduct constituted a form of genocide.
                                         Herero family

Beginning of the German-Herero War
In 1904 Germany began a war of annihilation  against the Hereros  in retaliation  for the Hereros'  resistance against the German  colonial  administration's  oppressive  treatment. The  German-Herero  War was  one  of the world's  bloodiest  conflicts  occurring  between  1815  and  1914.  From  the beginning  of the war, many Germans supported the total annihilation  of the Hereros.

 Two  days  after  the  Hereros  began  resisting the  colonial  administration,  the  German  Colonial  League's  Executive  Committee  released  apamphlet  calling  for  a  swift  and  harsh  response. A  letter  written  by  a German  missionary to  his colleagues  captures the  violent sentiment  among Germans  in Hereroland supporting  the  annihilation of the Hereros:
             "The  Germans  are  consumed  with  inexpiable  hatred  and  a terrible
              thirst  for  revenge,  one  might  even  say  they  are  thirsting  for  the
              blood  of the  Herero[s].  All  you  hear these  days  is  "make  a  clean
              sweep,  hang  them, shoot  them  to the  last man,  give  no  quarter."  I
              shudder  to  think  what  may  happen  in  the  months  ahead.  The
              Germans will  doubtless exact a grim vengeance."

The diaries, letters, and photographs of contemporaries graphically portray the indiscriminate shootings, hangings, and beatings which were the order of the day. Missionary Elger, stationed in the settlement of
Karibib, described the manner in which Herero prisoners were treated:
               Things proceeded in a particularly brutal manner. Herero prisoners were terribly
               maltreated, whether they were guüty or not guilty. About 4 Herero were            
              taken prisoner, because they were supposed to have killed a railway worker
              (Lehmann, Habis). The court martial ordered them to be freed and declared
              them to be not guilty. However one could not release them as they bore too
              many marks of shameful abuse [Schandlicher Misshandlung] on their bodies. For
              example, people had beaten an eye out of one. After the court martial had
              declared them to be innocent, some of the Germans outside immediately resumed
              the abuse with the words, 'the court has declared you to be innocent,
              we however want to string you up."
                                      Battle of okahandja on Hereros

Some German politicians did oppose the policy of annihilation. In March 1904  August Bebel, the  leader  of the Social Democratic Party, objected in the German parliament to German troops' barbarous treatment of
the Hereros. Likewise, Theodor Leutwein, the German governor of South West Africa, criticized  the  annihilation on economic grounds, arguing that Herero laborers were necessary for the success of the colonial enterprise.
                                        Herero fighters with their weapons

In April  1904,  three months  after the war began,  the German  Emperor Wilhelm  II  appointed  Lieutenant-General  Lothar  von  Trotha  as  commander-in-chief  of the  German  forces  in  South West Africa. Von  Trotha had  already  become  well  known  for  his  brutal  suppression  of indigenous
resistance  efforts in the  1896 East African Wahehe  Rebellion  and the  1900-1901  Boxer  Rebellion  in  China. By  November  1904  von  Trotha  had  informed  Governor  Leutwein  that  "[h]is  Majesty  the Emperor  only  said  that he expected  me to crush the rebellion by fair means or foul," and that "[i]t was  and  remains  my  policy  to  apply  this  force  by  unmitigated  terrorism and  even  cruelty.  I shall  destroy  the rebellious  tribes  by shedding rivers of blood and money.
    Governor Theodore Leutwein with the captain of the namaque (Orlam) Hendrik Witbooi (left) and the leader of the Herero Mahahero Samuel (right)


The Extermination Order
Under the command of von Trotha, the German army sought to engineer a crushing defeat of the Herero in the vicinity of the Waterberg (Pool, 1979: 210—11). In keeping with von Moltke's principles of separate deployment and encirclement, von Trotha sent his armies to annihilate the Herero at the Waterberg. Or, as he put it in his own words:
                   My initial plan for the Operation, which I always adhered to, was to encircle the
                   masses of Hereros at Waterberg, and to annihilate these masses with a simultaneous
                  blow, then to establish various stations to hunt down and disarm the
                  splinter groups who escaped, later to lay hands on the captains by putting prize
                  money on their heads and formally to sentence them to death. (von Trotha's
                  diaries cited in Pool, 1991: 251).

On 11 August, the battle of Hamakari at the Waterberg took place. The Herero were defeated and fled in a southeasterly direction into the dry desert sands of the Kalahari, known to the Herero as the Omaheke. It is estimated that up to 2000 pastoralist Herero escaped eastward in small numbers into the Kalahari desert, into what was then the British protectorate of Bechuanaland (Botswana).  Included was Samuel Maharero, the Herero leader. His people arrived with little or no cattle and became subservient to the Tswana - Bechwana chieftain of Sekgathôlê a Letsholathêbê.  Von  Trotha  promptly  translated  his  intention  to  destroy  the  Hereros into official  policy.  On October  2,  1904,  von Trotha  issued an  annihilation order stipulating:
                     The Herero people must ... leave the land. If the populace does not do this I
                     will force them with the Groot Rohr [cannon]. Within the German borders
                     every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will
                     no longer accept women and children, I will drive them back to their people
                     or I will let them be shot at.
                     These are my words to the Herero people.
                      [Signed] The great General of the mighty German Kaiser."
                         Captured and photographed Herero

A number of authors have sought to deny or at least downplay the existence and implications of Trotha's proclamation, which has become known as the extermination order (Vernkhtungsbefehl) . However, Trotha's
own words, in his diary and elsewhere, indicate that hè understood the implications of his proclamation füll well. On the day the proclamation was issued, Trotha wrote in a letter:
                    I believe that the nation as such should be annihilated, or, if this was not
                    possible by tactical measures, have to be expelled from the country by operative
                    means and further detailed treatment. This will be possible if the water-holes
                   from Grootfontein to Gobabis are occupied. The constant movement of our
                   troops will enable us to find the small groups of the nation who have moved
                   back westwards and destroy them gradually....


                   My intimate knowledge of many central African tribes (Bantu and others)
                   has everywhere convinced me of the necessity that the Negro does not respect
                   treaties but only brute force. (Pool, 1991: 272-4)"

                                        Chained hereros

An  official report sent two days later by von Trotha to the chief of the  army general staff underlined the intent of the extermination  order:
                       'The  crucial  question  for me was  how to  bring  the war  against  the
                        Herero  [Nation]  to  a  close....  As  I  see  it,  the  nation  must  be
                        destroyed  as  such ....  I  ordered  the  warriors...  to  be
                        court-marshalled  and  hanged and  all  women  and  children  who
                        sought  shelter  here  to  be  driven  back  into  the  sandveld  [the
                        Kalahari  Desert]  ....  To  accept  women  and  children  who  are  for
                        the most part sick, poses  a grave risk  to the force,  and to feed them
                        is out  of the  question. For this reason,  I  deem it wiser for the entire
                        nation to  perish ....  This uprising  is  and remains  the  beginning  of
                        a racial struggle  . . ."

         Boys in chains

The  day  after the  Germans  announced  the  extermination order, they  forced thirty Herero  prisoners,  including women and  children, to watch  the  hanging  of the  Hereros  who  had  been  sentenced  to  death.'  The  German  officials  read  the  extermination  order  to  the  prisoners,  handed  out  printed
copies,  and  drove  them  into  the  Kalahari  Desert."  The  hangings  marked the  beginning  of the  German  efforts,  led  by  von  Trotha,  to  destroy  the Hereros.

Von  Trotha's  correspondence  confirms  that  the  German-Herero  War was  a war  of annihilation  expressly  intended  to  wipe  out the  Hereros.  In a letter to Governor Leutwein  on October  27,  1904, he wrote,  "That [Herero] nation  must  vanish  from  the  face  of  the  earth.'' Governor Leutwein responded to this letter by requesting  permission from the German  Foreign Office  to allow  the  Hereros  to surrender, writing  that  "[a]ccording  to reliable  sources, a number of Herero[s]  have offered  to submit." The writings  of  von  Trotha's  subordinate  officers  in  Hereroland  also  provide evidence  of von  Trotha's  intent  to  annihilate  the  Hereros.
                     
                          General Lothar von Trotha (front right) and Governor Theodor Leutwein (front left) with officers in Windhoek (German Southwest Africa), 1904


In November  1904  the  Foreign  Office recalled  Leutwein to Germany, and  Lothar  von Trotha  replaced  him  as  governor  of South West  Africa. Although  Leutwein's  recall  quieted  his  criticism  of von  Trotha's  tactics, opposition  to  von  Trotha's  extermination  policy  increased.  Missionaries, members  of the  Colonial  Department,  and  others  criticized  von  Trotha's plan. Imperial  Chancellor  Bernhard  von  Billow wrote  to  Emperor Wilhelm  II  requesting  permission  to  revoke  von  Trotha's  Extermination
Order.

 The  request  stated  four  reasons:  (1)  inconsistency  of the  plan  to annihilate  the  Hereros  with  Christianity  and  humanity,  (2)  impossibility of success,  (3)  economic  detriment to the colonial  enterprise  by depriving it  of its  "productive  forces,"  and  (4)  establishment  of a  policy  that  was "demeaning  to  [Germany's]  standing  among  the  civilized  nations of the world."
           I followed their spoor and found numerous wells which presented a terrifying
           sight. Cattle which had died of thirst lay scattered around the wells. These cattle
           had reached the wells but there had not been enough time to water them. The
           Herero fled ahead of us into the Sandveld. Again and again this terrible scène
          kept repeating itself. With fevernt energy the men had worked at opening the
          wells; however the water became ever sparser, and wells ever more rare. They
          fled from one well to the next and lost virtually all their cattle and a large
          number of their people. The people shrank into small remnants who continually fall
          into our hands   [unsere Gewalt kamen]; sections of the people escaped now and  
          later through the Sandveld into English territory [present-day Botswana]. It was a
          policy as gruesome as it was senseless, to hammer the people so much; we could
          have still saved many of them and their rieh herds, if we had pardoned and taken
         them up again; they had been punished enough. I suggested this to General von Trotha,
         but he wanted their total extermination. (von Estorff, 1979: 117; author's translation)

On  December  8,  1904,  the  Emperor  rescinded  the  Extermination Order. However,  the  decision was  narrowly  tailored  and  did  not  prohibit future  genocidal  acts.  Instead  it  only  required  that  "mercy"  be  included among  the  colonial  administration's  possible  policy  options. The general' staff  wrote,  "His  Majesty  has  not  forbidden  you  to  fire  on  the Herero[s]....  But  the  possibility  of  showing  mercy,  ruled  out  by  the proclamation  of 2  October [the  Extermination  Order],  is ...  to  be restored again. In  addition,  the  rescission  of the  Order  did  not officially  disapprove  of von  Trotha  or  his  tactics. Indeed,  the  following  year  Emperor Wilhelm  II  awarded  von  Trotha  a  medal  of honor  for  his  work  in  South West Africa.

By late 1905, an estimated 8,800 Herero were confined in camps, working on various military and civilian projects scattered across German South West Africa (Berichte der Rheinischen Missions-Gesellschafi, 1906: 10). Missionary sources provide us with eyewitness accounts of conditions in the camps.

Missionaries stationed in the Herero Konzentrationslager reported to their superiors in Germany on the extensive and unchecked rape, beatings and execution of surrendered Herero by German soldiers (Gewald, 1999: 184-204). Missionary Kuhlmann spoke of the delight of settler women witnessing the drawn-out public hangings of captured Herero in Windhoek. At one such hanging, a drooling Herero fighting for his life was berated: 'You swine, wipe your muzzle' (Oermann, 1998: 113—14). In Karibib,
missionary Elger wrote:
               And then the scattered Herero returned from the Sandfeld. Everywhere they
               popped up — not in their original areas - to submit themselves as prisoners.
               What did the wretched people look like?! Some of them had been starved to
              skeletons with hollow eyes, powerless and hopeless, afflicted by serious diseases,
               particularly with dysentery. In the settlements they were placed in big kraals,

              and there they lay, without blankets and some without clothing, in the tropical
              ram on the marsh-like ground. Here death reaped a harvest! Those who had
              some semblance of energy naturally had to work—
              It was a terrible misery with the people; they died in droves. Once 24 came
              together, some of them carried. In the next hour one died, in the evening the
              second, in the first week a total of ten - all [lost] to dysentery - the people had
              lost all their energy and all their will to live
              Hardly cheering cases were those where people were handed in to be healed
             from the effects of extreme mistreatment [schwerer Misshandlungen]: there were
             bad cases amongst these."

Slave Labor and Concentration Camps

This Deutsch Süd-Wes Afrika trading card was made by the German chocolate maker Hartwig & Vogel, Dresden. It specifically named and included a "Hottentot Hut" with "Herero Mother and Child" placed to the front of the "Windhoek Castle". Compare the scene to the reality of the "Windhoek Castle" with the German concentration death camp shown to the card upper right.

*The Namas who supported the Hereros cause were also not spared at all. The Nama led by Hendrick Witbooi, had fought with the Germans against the Herero. Regardless, von Trotha turned his murderous attention to him, sending Witbooi, Cornelius Fredericks and other chiefs the following message; The Nama who choose not to surrender and lets himself be seen in the German area will be shot until all are exterminated. Those who at the start of the rebellion committed murder against whites, or have commanded that whites be murdered have by law, forfeited their lives. As for the few not defeated, it will fare with them as it fared with the Herero, who in their blindness also believed that they could make successful war against the powerful German Emperor and the great German people. I ask you, where are the Herero today? Approximately ten thousand Nama were annihilated during the ensuing battles while 9000 were confined to concentration camps.

              Hendrik Witbooi (Center)

Hendrik Witbooi was killed. In September 1906, Cornelius Fredericks and the fighters of Witbooi surrendered and were sent to Shark Island. Death in the camp was meticulously recorded. Solders were tasked with naming the dead and recording numbers. Their records show that of the 1795 Nama prisoners who had arrived, only 763 were alive in April. One thousand thirty two had died. The detailed record shows that of the living, 123 were in such poor health they would soon die. By 1908 when the camps were closed, disease and malnutrition had killed up to 80% of all prisoners who had entered Shark Island - including Namaqua chief Cornelius Fredericks. (Hendrick Witbooi had been killed in battle.)*

                                Shark Island Death Camp


             Captured and chained Herero/namas

Even  after  the  Emperor  rescinded  the  Extermination  Order,  the German  colonial  administration  continued  to decimate  the Hereros by  forcing  Herero  prisoners  of war  into  slave-labor  and concentration  camps. The  German  Imperial  Chancellor,  Prince von Bilow,  ordered the  creation
of  concentration  camps  in  Hereroland  in  1904." By  late  May  1905  the Germans  had  taken  8,040  Herero  prisoners  of war,  of whom  more  than three-quarters  were  women  and  children."  The Germans  immediately shipped  the  prisoners  to slave-labor  camps, where  they worked  under  grueling  conditions
'  and  were  subjected  to  medical  experiments.' According to one  account, conditions within  the camps were brutal: "[Prisoners  of war]  were placed  behind double rows  of barbed  wire fencing....  and housed in pathetic  [jammerlichen] structures  constructed  out  of simple  sacking  and  planks,  in  such  a manner that  in  one structure 30  to 50  people  were  forced to stay  without distinction as  to  age and  sex.  From  early  morning  until  late  at  night, on  weekdays as well  as  on Sundays  and holidays,  they  had  to  work  under  the  clubs  of  raw  overseers...  until  they  broke down.... Like cattle,  hundreds were driven to death  and like cattle they were buried. In Windhoek, the capital  of the  territory,  a separate camp was  created  in which Herero women were kept specifically for the sexual  gratification  of German troops.
New Window: Large Photo
Concentration Camp for captured Herero beside the Alte Feste in Windhoek, ca 1904-1908

Anthropologist Wilhelm Waldeyer received Herero body parts from the concentration camps. They were shipped to Berlin by doctors Dansauer, Jungels, Mayer and Zöllner, then studied by him and his students.

The zoologist Leonard Schultze complained of the difficulty collecting animal specimens in the wild because of the fighting. However, he noted the fighting presented opportunities for 'physical anthropology'. He said; 'I could make use of the victims of the war and take parts from fresh native corpses, which made a welcome addition to the study of the living body. Imprisoned Hottentots were often available to me'.

                    Herero/nama heads used for experiment by the Germans

("[Clamp  prisoners  were  transformed  into  human  subjects  for  various laboratory  experiments  designed  to  confirm  the racial  inferiority  of black  peoples.  These  experiments were  overseen  by Dr.  Eugen  Fischer who  became  the  senior  geneticist of the  Nazi regime.").[M]edical  experiments  were  also  conducted there by (literally)  the  teachers  of Josef Mengele, the Auschwitz "Angel of  Death" [forty] years  later."). He studied and made tests with the heads of 778 Herero and Nama dead prisoners of war. Severed heads were preserved - numbered and labeled as Hottentotte - the German colonial name for the Nama. He used 'research' to prove the black race is inferior to the Germanic - Aryan race. By measuring skulls - facial features and eye colors - Fischer and his protégés sought to prove the native races were inferior - and as he put it - animals. Fischer's  work  influenced  Nazi physicians  and German  medical  experiments  in concentration  camps. Fischer's book on  his  research  in  Namibia,  The  Principles of Human Heredity and Race Hygiene, "went  on  to become  one  of Hitler's  favorite reads."  He  later became  chancellor  of the University  of Berlin, and one of his prominent students was Josef Mengele, "the notorious doctor who performed genetic experiments on Jewish children at the Auschwitz concentration camp." ("Here  [in German South  West Africa]  the  first concentration  camps  were set  up, and 30  years before Hitler the  cult of the German  master  race  was  practiced." "Concentration camps  were  neither  a  Russian  invention  nor  a  German  one.  They  were  first  established  in  1896  by Spaniards  in Cuba .. The German colonial  powers...  contributed  to the history  of the  concentration camp  by introducing the idea of forced  labor "
 .The mortality rate  was  extremely  high:  more  than  12%  of the  Hereros  serving as  slave  labor for railroad  construction  died in  a period  of six weeks
.                Sexual serfdom: Two adolescent Herero girls posing naked were photographed by a German soldier. PHOTOGRAPH: COURTESY OF JUTTA ANA DOBLER

In the settlement of Windhoek, missionary Meier described the condition of Herero who came to the sickbay run by the mission. His words provide some idea of what occurred in the Windhoek camp:
                  How often these poorest, those who deserved pity, came staggering! Many of
                  them, who could no longer move, were brought on stretchers, most of them
                  unconscious; however, those who could still think were glad that the hard
                  supervision of the ... guards in the Kraal and their Shambok [rawhide whip] ...
                  had for the time being been left behind'.
 The Germans  killed all  Hereros  who  tried  to  escape  the  inhuman  conditions  in the camps immediately  and without mercy. The  brutal  living  and  working  conditions  in the  camps  constituted  a policy  decision  on  the  part  of  Germany. Vice  Governor  Hans Tecklenburg  commented  on the  high mortality rate in the  camps  in  a  letter to  the  Colonial  Department  stating,  "[t]he  more  the  Herero  people experience  personally  the  consequences  of the  rebellion,  the  less  will be their  desire-and  that  of  generations  to  come-to  stage  another uprising....  [T]he  ordeal  they  are  now  undergoing  is  bound  to  have  a
more lasting effect.
Felix von Luschan, director of the Ethnology Museum in Berlin, was an ethnologist obsessed with collecting human skulls and skeletons. He drew up guidelines for travelers to German colonies, instructing them how to pack skulls, skeletons and human brains for shipment. This 'currently respected director' boasted, you could get a human skeleton for a piece of soap. 

One year after the extermination war began, Felix Luschan asked a notorious racist by the name of Lieutenant Ralf Zürn 'commander of Okahandja', if he was aware of any way in which the Museum might collect a larger number Herero skulls? The Lieutenant had already supplied him with a skull, wrote back saying this would be possible 'since in the concentration camps taking and preserving the skulls of Herero prisoners of war will be more readily possible than in the country, where there is always a danger of offending the ritual feelings of the natives'. 

Soldiers began to trade in the skulls of dead Herero and Nama people. They sold them to scientists, museums and universities back in Germany who advertized for them. The practice was so widespread that this postcard was made showing soldiers packing skulls - as normal colonial life.
Part of the postcard was reproduced in book form. The text above more or less reads; Herero skulls were packed into boxes by German South-West-Africa troops, to be sent to the pathologic institute in Berlin, so that they might be used for scientific measurements. Herero women removed meat, skin and hair form the skulls using pieces of broken glass. The skulls were from Herero's killed in action or of those hung.

The  brutality  against  the  Hereros  continued  as  Friedrich  von Lindequist  succeeded  von  Trotha  as  governor  of  South  West  Africa.Under  von  Lindequist,  German  military  hostilities  ceased  briefly  from
December  1905  until mid-1906. Despite the  pause in military strikes,  von Lindequist established  concentration  camps  in December  1905 for Hereros who  had  surrendered  to  Germans. By May  1906,  the  Germans  had  captured  14,769 Hereros:  4,137 men, 5,989  women, and 4,643  children.Two months later,  von Lindequist  wrote  to  the  Colonial Department  that  "[t]he northern  and  central  parts  of the  country,  in particular  Hereroland  proper, are  virtually  devoid  of  Herero[s]....  Those  still  roaming  about  will consider themselves  lucky if they come to no harm.
                           Starved  Hereros who survived their escape through the arid desert of Omaheke.

The German's  annihilation  campaign  was brutal and successful. When the  Germans  did  not shoot  or  hang  Herero  prisoners  of war,  they  drove them  into  the  desert. The  Germans  tattooed  survivors  "GH,  Gefangene Herero (imprisoned  Herero[s])" and  forced  them  into slave-labor  and concentration  camps. " By the  end of the war  in  1907,  "the  Herero  people as  such  was  annihilated."

                  German soldiers hanging Heroro and namas



                           Shootings,three German soldiers shoot against a tied African

In just  a  few  years,  the  Germans  killed  more than  65,000  of the  80,000  Hereros: they slaughtered  them  in battle, poisoned them, tortured them  to  death, trapped  them in their huts  and burned them  to  death, and  drove  them  into the  Kalahari  Desert  to  die  of hunger and  thirst. As the  following  Part  illustrates,  Germany's  massacre  of the Hereros  differs  from  many  other  atrocities  perpetrated  by  European  colonizers  against  indigenous  Africans because  its  express  purpose  was  annihilation.

The Herero camps were formally abolished in 1908.Thereafter, the Herero were confined within a tangled web of legislation that sought to control every aspect of the lives of all black people living in German South West.
Africa (GSWA). Within the areas of German control, all Africans over the age of 8 were ordered to wear metal passes. These passes, which were embossed with imperial crown, magisterial district, and labor number, were used to facilitate German control of labor. In addition, Herero were prohibited from owning land and cattle, the two foundations of what had been a society based on pastoralism.




                                              herero  in chains

The 'Blue Book'
At the outbreak of the First World War, South African forces under British command invaded GSWA and successfully defeated the much-vaunted German army. As the war progressed, it became clear that the victorious parties had no intention of allowing Germany to retain its colonies. To this end, from at least 1915 onwards British colonial officials were instructed to gather materials which would strengthen the British Empires claims to Germany's colonies.
In Namibia, this task was made much easier by the existence of an extremely well-organized and detailed government archive which awaited the incoming military administration in Windhoek. It contained chillingly detailed accounts and reports on the manner in which GSWA settlers, and the colony's administration, had dealt with the country's original inhabitants. Apart from files dealing with the incarceration of Herero in concentration camps and their distribution among settlers and private companies, the archives also contained a series of files on the excesses of settlers who had flogged Herero and Nama workers. Glass-plate negatives detailed the torn and rotting backs of women flogged for alleged insubordination, and pages upon pages of court transcripts detailed the brutal lashing of laborers.

The combination of dry testimony taken from the German archives in Windhoek, along with a series of painstakingly detailed statements given under oath by surviving Namibians, formed the basis of one of the most shocking documents of colonial history. The Report on the Natives of SouthWest Africa and their Treatment by Germany (London, 1918), generally referred to as the 'Blue Book,' remains an indispensable source document on the nature of German colonial rule in Namibia. It is beyond question thatthese materials effectively scuttled any attempts by Germany to retain control over its former colonies, and Namibia in particular. In Article 119 of the Versailles Treaty, Germany was declared unfit to govern colonies,
and was forced to renounce 'in favor of the Principal Allied and Associated Powers all her rights and titles over her oversea possessions.' In addition, under Article 22 of the new League of Nations charter, Namibia was held to be 'inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world,' and thus was deemed a territory that could 'be best administered under the laws of the Mandatory [the Union of South Africa] as integral portions of its territory.' Accordingly, Namibia was placed under the jurisdiction of South Africa (see du Pisani, 1985: 76).
Though the 'Blue Book' is one of the primary documents detailing the injustices perpetrated against the Herero and Nama peoples of Namibia, it was not used to ensure that Herero would receive compensation. Instead, the 'Blue Book' served to ensure that Namibian territory would be granted to South Africa to administer as a mandated territory. Far from the Herero receiving their land back, the new South African administration forced them to settle on marginal lands in reserves established on the fringes of the Omaheke, the desert into which they had been driven in the past.The new South African administration continued the policies initiated by its German predecessor. The lands previously occupied by the Herero
continued to be reserved for white settlement, and in the years after World War I the South African administration pursued an aggressive policy of land settlement for white Afrikaans-speaking immigrants from Angola and South Africa. In short, the injustices described with stark clarity in the 'Blue Book' were dismissed in the interests of white settler unity.

White settler unity and the 'Blue Book'
Nonetheless, the existence of the 'Blue Book' came to bedevil settler politics under the South African mandate. German settlers called for the "Blue Book' to be banned and all extant copies destroyed. In 1925, the first all-white election for a legislative assembly took place. Representatives of the German settler party, the Deutsche Bund in Südwestafrika, opposed settler parties allied to the Union of South Africa. Anxious to
maintain a working relationship with the settler bloc in the legislative assembly, the South African administrator, A.J. Werth, acceded to settler demands for the abolition of the 'Blue Book.' Thus, in 1926, one Mr Strauch, a member of the legislative assembly, tabled a motion stating that the 'Blue Book' 'only has the meaning of a war-instrument and that the time has come to put this instrument out of Operation and to impound and destroy all copies of this Blue Book, which may be found in the official records and in public libraries of this Territory.'
The motion passed, and legislation came into effect in all territories administered by the Union of South Africa banning distribution of the 'Blue Book.' Copies were no longer made available to the public, were
removed from libraries, and were destroyed. In the rest of the British Empire, copies of the 'Blue Book' were transferred to the Foreign Office. Even in wartime Britain as late as 1941, in response to a request from the
Ministry of Information, it was noted that 'no copy may be issued without authority of the librarian.' Strauch, and his fellow members of the Deutscher Bund, consciously used the Herero genocide — or rather the recorded role of German settlers and soldiers in it - to put pressure on the South African administration. As Strauch noted, passing the motion hè had proposed 'would... remove one of the most serious obstacles to mutual trust and cooperation in this country [Namibia].' In his view,'the honour of Germany had been attacked in the most public manner and it was right that the attack should be repudiated in an equally public fashion.... The defence of the honour of ones country was a solemn duty imposed upon all sons of that country.' The validity of Strauchs claims went unquestioned by the assembly, and certainly no Herero view of the events was allowed an airing. The subjective arguments of Strauch and his compatriots thus sought to obscure the past in the interest of preserving their own privileged position as settlers. The promise of peaceful cooperation with the German settler Community was uppermost in the minds of South Africa's
administrators. Strauchs claim that 'the Germans were ready and anxious to cooperate in the building up of South West but they could not do so.


Seeking to deny the past
In the run-up to Namibian independence in 1990, Brigitte Lau, a historian well known for her uncompromising stand against South African colonial rule in Namibia, published an article that shocked and surprised many of her colleagues. In her article, she stated: There is absolutely no evidence... that the Herero perished or were used on a large scale as "slave laborers"' (Lau, 1989: 5). Furthermore, Lau argued that the Vernichtungsbefehl issued by General Lothar vonTrotha, commanding officer of German forces in Namibia at the time, 'was a successful attempt at psychological warfare never followed in deed' (Lau, 1989: 5).

 Lieutenant  von Durling - German Death Camp at Shark Island

In addition, Lau sought to problematize the term Vernichtung by arguing that it did not imply extermination.
Finally, she argued that the basis for much of the allegations of genocide by German soldiers in Namibia, the 1904 'Report of the Treatment of Natives by Germany' (sic), was 'an English piece of war propaganda
with no credibility whatsoever' (Lau, 1989: s). Needless to say, Lau's article exploded like a bombshell among the small Community of scholars specializing in Namibian history (Lau, 1989: 4—8).

                          Hereros in Shark Island German Death (Concentration) Camp

With hindsight, and on the basis of later conversations, it became clear that Lau wished to move the academie community away from what she saw as its unjust fascination with the Herero—German war. Instead, she argued, historians should concentrate on what she considered to be the more destructive colonial rule of South Africa in Namibia. Yet again, the genocide that Imperial Germany perpretrated upon the Herero was being negated and denied in the interests of contemporary politics.

Click either image for larger resolution pictures.
Shark Island Death Camp - Photography by Lieutenant  von Durling


Nevertheless, Lau's article, recently republished in German, continues to have repercussions that extend far beyond Namibian history. On the electronic website of the Traditionsverband ehemaliger Schutz und Uberseetruppen (Traditional association of the former protectorate and overseas forces), an organization that seeks to preserve and glorify the memory of Germany's colonial armies, Laus article is predictablyacclaimed. In addition, the Traditionsverband directs readers to 'Wiedergutmachung am der Volk der Herero?' (Restitution for the Herero People?), an article that denies von Trotha harboured any genocidal intentions, and seeks to dismiss Herero claims for reparation.
                                    Hanged  Hereros

Michael Scott and Herero representations to the UN
To the members of the white settler community, it may have looked as if the attempt to destroy and rewrite the past according to their own preferences had succeeded. For a number of years after 1926, nothing was
heard of the Herero genocide. Within the territory, Herero had been forced to withdraw to the newly established Native reserves, where they refrained from directly articulating demands that related to the genocide (Gewald, 2OOi).This is not to say that the genocide was no longer of any importance to Herero society - far front it. Instead, Herero society turned in upon itself, seeking äs far äs possible to refrain from any interaction with the colonial state. References to the genocide perpetrated against the Herero surfaced from time to time in unexpected places, yet the subject was no longer part and parcel of the colonial discourse.

In the aftermath of World War II, the South African government undertook steps to incorporate Namibia as the fifth province of the Union ofSouth Africa. To this end, in 1946 a series of carefully structured meetings
were held with the African population of the territory. As the newly formed United Nations had taken over from the League of Nations, Namibia, as a mandated territory, feil again under South African jurisdiction, with UN oversight. It was widely hoped that the colonially appointed and recognized leaders of Namibias African populations would give their sanction to South Africa's plan to incorporate Namibia. However, this was not to be. The events of 1904—08 again became central to the concerns of settlers and the colonial administration with the arrival of the Rev. Michael Scott in Windhoek in 1947. In conjunction with
Herero leaders, Scott used the atrocities perpetrated in the Herero genocide as a weapon against the incorporation of Namibia into South Africa. In the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust, the füll extent of which was still only just beginning to be understood, an earlier genocide inflicted by the fathers of the Nazi perpetrators made for powerful political ammunition (Emmett, 1999: 253).
Throughout most of 1948, Michael Scott lived in a tent along the Gammans river, just beyond the old location of Windhoek. Here hè met and entertained township residents, many of whom had experienced the
horrors of German rule firsthand (Troup, 1950: 173—80). Scott could not fail to have his attention drawn to the Herero genocide. Here, in a nutshell, Scott held, were the core inequities of colonial rule: a people had been driven off their land, slaughtered, banished to live in barren homelands — and still they held no rights. This concise presentation of history served to detail the injustice suffered by the Herero, at the hands not only of Imperial Germany, but of the mandated power, South Africa.

                          surrounded Herero

An article entitled 'Michael Scott and the Hereros,' published in The New Statesman and Nation in 1949, aptly summarized Scotts view of Namibian history:
                   "Then came the German colonists, hungry for land; and finally von Trotha, a
                   genera! whom Hitler would have delighted to honour.... In 1904 hè issued the
                   'Extermination Order.' All Hereros whether man, woman or child were to be
                    killed. An orgy of looting, torture, and massacre followed. To read the records
                    is exactly like reading the accounts of the obliteration of Poland, except that the
                    Germans had not gas chambers then, but killed babies with their own hands,
                    or burned sick old women in their huts. The tribe broke and fled The
                    majority, all but fifteen thousand out of ninety thousand, were hacked to pieces
                    by the Germans or died of thirst.'
The mention of von Trotha s 'extermination order' clearly indicates that Scott had managed to gain access to a copy of the 'Blue Book.' Scott's history also made explicit the link between the horrors perpetrated by the
Nazis and the activities of Imperial Germany's forces in Namibia, a link that continues to generate considerable academic interest. In addition, Scott explored how the South Africans had betrayed the Herero:
                      In the 1914 war, lured by British promises that native lands would be returned,
                      the desert remnant trekked back. But in 1918 they met not the British as the
                      Mandatory Power, but the South Africans, who never for a moment considered
                      giving them back their tribal lands. Some pastures were left to the German
                      settlers who remained. More went to the Afrikaner settlers.
Throughout 1948 and 1949, in the face of constant harassment, Scott sought to bring conditions in Namibia to the attention of the world. Eventually, in November 1949, the United Nations granted Scott an official
hearing. Clearly, this did not stand him in good stead with South African officialdom. In the months following Scott's hearing, a campaign was initiated by the colonial authorities in Namibia, seeking to cast aspersions
on Scott's statements. Vihfied in the press, Scott continued to be supported by Herero, many of whom recalled the events of 1904-08 to justify their faith in the reverend. One such Herero, who signed his letter 'A
Native who has been deprived of his land from 1904—1950,' noted: 'I want to emphasise that the Information given by the Rev. Michael Scott at UNO is what actually happened in S.WA. and was obtained from the best reliable sources' (Windhoek Advertiser, 1950). Shortly after, Scott, already the victim of constant harassment, was declared a prohibited immigrant and prevented from ever returning to Namibia.


Regaining the international stage
It is in the context of the above events that on 22 August 1999, Dr Kuaima Riaruako, the self-appointed paramount chief and king of all of the Herero, proclaimed that the 'Herero nation' as a whole had decided
to approach the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague in order to lay a charge of genocide against the German state, calling for reparations for the slaughter and other atrocities inflicted on the Herero.
At the time, Riaruako s statement ruffled a few feathers in Namibia itself. German diplomats in Windhoek emailed colleagues in Bonn/Berlin to look into the issue. Two days later, a clinically worded statement by a
spokesperson of the World Court put everyone, with the exception of Riaruako, at ease: 'Only states may be parties in contentious cases before the ICJ and hence submit cases to it against other states.'





In the absence of a formal apology, the call for war reparations from the Federal Republic of Germany has become more vociferous. Government inaction, the continued extensive presence of German tourists, settlers, businesses and farms, and continued marginalization of the Herero lend increasing legitimacy to the Herero claims. This new visibility was evident with the launch of two court cases in the US District of Columbia. With the support of Afro-American organizations, the 'Herero People's Reparations Corporation' (HPRC) was established as a corporation, in keeping with the laws of the District of Columbia, and the court cases were launched in its name. Three German companies, Deutsche Bank AG, Terex Corporation (Orenstein und Koppel), and Woermann Line (Deutsch Afrika Linien), •were charged, along with the Federal Republic of Germany (in the person of its foreign minister, Joschka Fischer). The introductory paragraph of the charge reads as follows:
the Federal Republic of Germany ('Defendant' or 'Germany'), in a brutal alliance with German multi-national corporations, relentlessly pursued the enslavement and the genocidal destruction of the Herero Tribe in Southwest Africa, now Namibia. Foreshadowing with chilling precision the irredeemable horror of the European Holocaust only decades later, the Defendant formed a German commercial enterprise which cold-bloodedly employed explicitly sanctioned extermination, the destruction of tribal culture and social organization, concentration camps, forced labor, medical experimentation and the exploitation of women and children in order to advance their common financial interests.


The Federal Republic of Germany, as the legal successor to Imperial Germany, is responsible for what happened in the name of the Kaiser in Namibia. Genocide was perpetrated; thousands of people were put to
work as forced laborers; thousands were subjected to all manner of abuse. People were robbed of their land, possessions, and livestock, and driven forever from their ancestral lands. It is hard to say what form recompense in this egregious case should take; but a simple apology would be a beginning.


Over sixty years ago Germany began a process and acceptance and apology for the Holocaust in the second world war. Fifteen years before Hitler joined the Nazi Party, Germany killed 1000's in the African death camps of the Kaisers army. This fact makes a myth out of the post war foundation Germany it was supposedly built on. Make no mistake - the ghosts of the Herero and Nama will not go away. of Germanic input made NO dent on 21st century Herero and Nama graves. These continue to reflect the foundations of Herero and Nama pastoral culture, which von Trotha - Fischer and the Kaiser intended to annihilate.

The calls by the Namibian Hereros for reparation and court action has not yielded ant fruitful dividends from the German authorities that caused great inhumane treatment to the Namibian Hereros. A recent delegation of Namibians Herero leaders to Germany for the skull of hereros that were sent to Germany for experimentation were ill-treated by their German hosts. They were left in the meeting by their german counter-parts whiles the Herero delegations were still talking. Germany has made it abundantly clear that the development aid they have been given to Namibia since independence is for the benefit of all Namibians including Hereros and Namas that suffered under their repressive colonial era.
The German continue to deny the inhuman treatment/genocide committed against the Hereros. However, expressed regret for the incident. A statement issued by German Deputy Foreign Minister, Cornelia Pieper last month read, "We Germans acknowledge and accept this heavy legacy and the ensuing moral and historical responsibility to Namibia.

"The German Government is fulfilling this duty through particularly close bilateral cooperation - and development cooperation - with Namibia," it continued.

Pieper added, "I would also like to express my own personal deep regret and shame for what was done to the ancestors of the tribal representatives now in Berlin."

For his part, the CEO of Charite University Hospital, Professor Karl Max Einhaupl, apologized to the Namibian delegation present at the ceremony in Berlin for the role played by German scientists.

"With this step we face up to an inglorious chapter of German history," he said. "As a medical doctor and scientist myself, it is especially painful for me to realize that even physicians worked in the service of this early form of racism."

Peter said historians now agree that much of the research undertaken by these early scientists was a precursor to Nazi ideology and is now universally acknowledged as a "perverse" science.

Descendants of the von Trotha family travelled to Omaruru Namibia at the invitation of Herero Supreme Chief Alfons Maharero in 2007, whose grandfather Samuel Maharero led the Herero uprising in 1904. The von Trotha family publicly apologized for Lothar von Trotha's brutal cruelty to this people. Wolf-Thilo von Trotha said; "We, the von Trotha family, are deeply ashamed of the terrible events that took place 100 years ago". Well they should be! So too should be countless generations of von Trotha's to come... Imagine that one hundred years before their visit, and undisclosed German soldier was reported to have said of the massacres;

(http://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=facpub)
(https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/4853/ASC-1293873-001.pdf?sequence=1)
http://www.ezakwantu.com/Gallery%20Herero%20and%20Namaqua%20Genocide.htm


GENOCIDE SKULLS RETURNED TO NAMIBIA

Content provided by AFP
/nws/history/2011/09/30/skull-278.jpg
This skull along with 19 others were brought to Berlin by German soldiers after the Herero and Namaqua Genocide that occured between 1904 and 1907.


Germany will face up to a bloody chapter of its colonial past Friday when it hands back 20 skulls spirited away after what many historians call the first genocide of the 20th century.
A delegation of 55 Namibians is in Berlin to attend the solemn ceremony to receive the remains which they hope will be just a first step toward a greater reckoning with Germany's brief but brutal African adventure a century ago.

"We have come to first and foremost to receive the mortal human remains of our forefathers and mothers and to return them to the land of their ancestors," delegation member Ueriuka Festus Tjikuua told reporters in Berlin.


He said the mission intended to "extend a hand of friendship" to Germans and encourage a dialogue "with the full participation and involvement of the representatives of the descendants of those that suffered heavily under dreadful and atrocious German colonial rule".

Herero woman washing in her traditional dress. despite the Genocide they are still strong.
The skulls are among an estimated 300 taken to Germany after a massacre of indigenous Namibians at the start of the last century during an anti-colonial uprising in what was then called South West Africa, which Berlin ruled from 1884 to 1915.
Incensed by German settlers stealing their land, cattle and women, the Herero people launched a revolt in January 1904 with warriors butchering 123 German civilians over several days. The Nama tribe joined the uprising in 1905.
The imperial German colonial rulers responded ruthlessly. General Lothar von Trotha signed a notorious extermination order against the Hereros.
                                Herero woman
Rounded up in prison camps, captured Namas and Hereros died from malnutrition and severe weather. Dozens were beheaded after their death and their skulls sent to German researchers in Berlin for "scientific" experiments.
Up to 80,000 Hereros lived in Namibia when the uprising began. Afterwards, only 15,000 were left.
Settlement Site Skulls Hint at Mass Cannibalism
Over time, the skulls gathered dust in the German archives until three years ago when a German reporter uncovered them at the Medical History Museum of the Charite hospital in Berlin, and at Freiburg University in the southwest.
So far, 47 skulls have been found at the Charite and about a dozen more in Freiburg.


                               Herero woman waving
The publicity around their discovery prompted Herero and Nama leaders to ask the Namibian government to seek their return. After three years of talks, the delegation arrived in Berlin Sunday.
"The skulls will be handed over to the Namibian government in a ceremony that reflects their historical and cultural importance," a foreign ministry spokeswoman said, adding that Deputy Foreign Minister Cornelia Pieper would take part.
Charite spokeswoman Claudia Peter said the purported "research" on the skulls performed by German scientists had been rooted in the perverse racial theories that later planted the seeds for the Nazis' genocidal ideology.
"They thought that they could prove that certain peoples were worth less than they were," she told AFP. "What these anthropologists did to these people was wrong and their descendants are still suffering for it."
Herero African woman with traditional clothing, hairstyle and jewelry, Namibia, South Africa, and Botswana
German researchers have now determined the region from which the skulls came as well as the sex and age of the victims but say there is no hope of learning their identity or cause of death.
The Namibian representatives will return home Tuesday with a memorial service planned in the capital Windhoek the following day to welcome the 11 Nama and nine Herero skulls, which will go on display in a local museum.
The remains derived from four women, 15 men and a boy.
Ida Hoffmann, a former parliamentarian, said the delegation hoped to begin a dialogue with the German side that could eventually lead to direct reparation payments for the victims' descendants.
"I am here in Germany today to collect the remains of my ancestors. These skulls are but one part of human dignity. But the question remains: what of the other parts," she told reporters.
Germany has repeatedly refused reparations, saying that its 600 million euros ($818 million) in development aid since Namibia's independence in 1990 was "for the benefit of all Namibians".(http://news.discovery.com/history/germany-return-skulls-namibia-genocide0110930.html).




Herero women wearing traditional dress for the Ma Herero Day Parade, August, Okahandja, Namibia.










































































                         Herero woman









5 comments:

  1. This was fascinating, thank you for sharing. I studied anthropology - I too like to write!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What terrible terrible events. May the world never forget, and may the humanity of the Herero prosper and be celebrated! Justice Malanot

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi! I noted that you have used two of my photographs with captions in this blog post (no. 3 and 4 from the top). I am happy that you have found the images useful, but a reference to me as their author would be appreciated. A link to my Flickr account, where these photos originated from (http://www.flickr.com/photos/55354963@N05/) would be appreciated even more.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Guess what, In one of the photos, i found my sister!! Even though i did'nt agree with some of your conclusions (from an insider's perspective), Bravo to you, This is Love!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello, I am a student from the United States who is writing a research project on the Herero people, and more specifically the Namibian Genocide. You sound like an expert on the topic and it would be great if we could connect through email and allow me to ask you some questions. Is there any way for me to contact you? Thank you!

    ReplyDelete